Research References

  • Adalsteinsdottir, K. (2004). Teachers’ behaviour and practices in the classroom. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 48, 95-114.
  • Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and achievement gap in 47 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369-387.
  • Alexander, N. A. (2002). Race, poverty, and the student curriculum: Implications for standards policy. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 675-693.
  • Andrews, M., Duncombe, W., & Yinger, J. (2002). Revisiting economies of size in American education: Are we any closer to a consensus? Economics of Education Review, 21, 245-262.
  • Archibald, S. (2006). Narrowing in on educational resources that do affect student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(4), 23-42.
  • Barker, R., & Gump, P. (1964). Big school, small school: High school size and student behavior. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  • Barnett, R. R., Glass, C, Snowdon, R. I., & Stringer, K. S. (2002). Size, performance and effectiveness: Cost-constrained measures of best-practice performance and secondary- school size. Education Economics, 10, 291-310.
  • Barty, K., Thomson, P., Blackmore, J., & Sachs, J. (2005). Unpacking the issues: Researching the shortage of school principals in two states in Australia. Australian Educational Researcher, 32(3), 1-17.
  • Bickel, R., & Howley, C. (2000). The influence of scale on school performance: A multi-level extension of the Matthew principle. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(22), 1-33.
  • Bickel, R., Howley, C, Williams, T., & Glascock, C. (2001). High school size, achieve- ment equity and cost: Robust interaction effects and tentative results. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 9(40). Retrieved October 2, 2008, from http://epaa.asu .edu/epaa/v9n40.html
  • Bos, K. T., Ruijters, A. M., & Visscher, A. J. (1990). Truancy, dropout, class repeating and their relation with school characteristics. Educational Research, 32, 175-185.
  • Bowles, T. J., & Bosworth, R. (2002). Scale economies in public education: Evidence from school level data. Journal of Education Finance, 28, 285-300.
  • Bradley, S., & Taylor, J. (1998). The effect of school size on exam performance in secondary schools. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60, 291-324. • Brown, G. T. L. (2004). Teachers’ conceptions of assessment: Implications for policy and professional development. Assessment in Education, 11, 301-318.
  • Chakraborty, K., & Lewis, W. C. (1996). Scale economics in public education. Regional Analysis and Policy, 26(1), 23-35.
  • Coladarci, T., & Cobb, C. D. (1996). Extracurricular participation, school size, and achievement and self-esteem among high school students: A national look. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 12, 92-103.
  • Collins, A., Joseph, D., & Bielaczyc, K. (2004). Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 15-42.
  • Cotton, K. (1996). School size, school climate, and student performance. School Improvement Research Series (SIRS). Retrieved July 10, 2007, from http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/10/c020.html
  • Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). School size and the interpersonal side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational context. Social Science Quarterly, 85, 1257-1274.
  • Darling-Hammond, L., Ancess, J., & Ort, S.W. (2002). Reinventing high school: Outcomes of the coalition campus schools project. American Educational Research Journal, 39, 639-673.
  • Duncan, C. R., & Noonan, B. (2007). Factors affecting teachers’ grading and assessment practices. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 53(1), 1-21.
  • Eberts, R. W., Schwartz, E. K., & Stone, J. A. (1990). School reform, school size and student achievement. Economic Review, 26(2), 2.
  • Falch, T., & Strom, B. (2005). Teacher turnover and non-pecuniary factors. Economics of Education Review, 24, 611-631.
  • Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2007). Profiles and portfolios of adolescent school- based extracurricular activity participation. Journal of Adolescence, 30, 313-332.
  • Foreman-Peck, J., & Foreman-Peck, L. (2006). Should schools be smaller? The size- performance relationship for Welsh schools. Economics of Education Review, 25, 157-171.
  • Fowler, W. J., Jr., & Walberg, H. J. (1991). School size, characteristics and outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 13, 189-202.
  • Fox, W. F. (1981). Reviewing economies of size in education. Journal of Educational Finance, 6,273-296.
  • Finn, J. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142.
  • Friedkin, N. E., & Necochea, J. (1988). School system size and performance: A con- tingency perspective. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 10, 237-249.
  • Funk, P. E., & Bailey, J. (1999). Small schools, big results: Nebraska high school com- pletion and postsecondary enrollment rates. Walthill, NE: Center for Rural Affairs. (ERIC Document No. ED441633)
  • Gardner, P. W., Ritblatt, S. N., & Beatty, J. R. (2000). Academic achievement and parental school involvement as a function of high school size. High School Journal, 83(2), 21-27.
  • Goddard, R., Sweetland, S. R., & Hoy, W. K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban ele- mentary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multi-level analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683-702.
  • Holland, A., & Andre, T. (1994). The relationship of self-esteem to selected personal and environmental resources of adolescents. Adolescence, 29, 345-360.
  • Howley , C, & Bickel, R. (1999). The Matthew Project national report. Randolph, VT: The Rural School and Community Trust. (ERIC Document No. ED433174)
  • Huling, L. (1980). How school size affects student participation, alienation. NASSP Bulletin, 4/438, 13-18.
  • James, H. T., & Levin, H. M. (1970). Financing community schools. In H. M. Levin (Ed.), Community control of schools (pp. 250-274). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
  • Kuziemko, I. (2006). Using shocks to school enrollment to estimate the effect of school size on student achievement. Economics of Education Review, 25, 63-75. • Lee, V., & Burkam, (2003). Dropping out of high school: The role of school organization and structure. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 353-393.
  • Lee, V., & Loeb, S. (2000). School size effect in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers’ attitudes and students’ achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 57,3-31.
  • Lee, V., Bryk, A., & Smith, J. B. (1993). The organization of effective high schools. In L. DarlingHammond (Ed.), Review of Research in Education, 19 (pp. 171-267). Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Lee, V., Ready, D. D., & Johnson, D. J. (2001). The difficulty of identifying rare sam- ples to study: The case of high schools divided into schools- within-schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 23, 365-379.
  • Lee, V., Smerdon, B. A., Alfeld-Liro, C, & Brown, S. L. (2000). Inside large and small high schools: Curriculum and social relations. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 147-171.
  • Lee, V., & Smith, J. B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education, 66, 164-187.
  • Lee, V., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on early gains in achievement and engagement. Sociology of Education, 68, 241-270.
  • Lee, V., & Smith, J. B. (1997). High school size: Which works best and for whom? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19, 205-227.
  • Lindsay, P. (1982). The effect of high school size on student participation, satisfaction and attendance. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 4, 57-64.
  • Ma, X. (2001). Bullying and being bullied: To what extent are bullies also victims? American Educational Research Journal, 38, 351-370.
  • Ma, X., & Mclntyre, L. J. (2005). Exploring differential effects of mathematics courses on mathematics achievement. Canadian Journal of Education, 28, 827-852.
  • Marian, S., & Mclntire, W. (1992, April). The influence of school size and rurality on achievement and retention. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
  • McNeal, R. B. (1997). High school dropouts: A closer examination of school effects. Social Science Quarterly, 78, 209-222.
  • McNeal, R. B., Jr. (1999). Participating in high school extracurricular activities: Investigating school effects. Social Science Quarterly, 80, 291-309.
  • McNeely, C. A., Nonnemaker, J. M., & Blum, R. W. (2002). Promoting school con- nectedness: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. Journal of School Health, 72, 138-146.
  • Monk, D. H. (1987). Secondary school enrollment and curricular comprehensiveness. Economics of Education Review, 6, 137-150.
  • Monk, D. H. (1990). Educational costs and small rural schools. Journal of Education Finance, 16, 213-225.
  • Monk, D. H., & Haller, E. J. (1993). Predictors of high school academic course offer- ings: The role of school size. American Educational Research Journal, 30, 3-21.
  • Osterman, K. (2000). Students’ need for belonging in the school community, Review of Educational Research, 70, 323-367.
  • Phillips, M. (1997). What makes schools effective? A comparison of the relationships of communitarian climate and academic achievement and attendance during middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 34, 633-662.
  • Ready, D. D., Lee, V. E., & Welner, K. G. (2004). Educational equity and school structure: School size, overcrowding, and schools-within-schools. Teachers College Record, 106, 1989-2014.
  • Rosenblatt, A. (2001). Teacher multiple roles and skill flexibility: Effects on work atti- tudes. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37, 684-708.
  • Rubie-Davies, C. M., & Townsend, M. A. R. (2007). Fractures in New Zealand ele- mentary school settings. Journal of School Health, 77, 36-40. • Rumberger, R. W. (1995). Dropping out of middle school: A multilevel analysis of stu- dents and schools. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 583-625.
  • Rumberger, R. W., & Palardy, G. J. (2005). Test scores, dropout rates and transfer rates at alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 42, 3-42.
  • Rumberger, R. W., & Thomas, S. L. (2000). The distribution of dropout and turnover rates among urban and suburban high schools. Sociology of Education, 73, 39-67.
  • Sadoski, M., & Willson, V. L. (2006). Effects of a theoretically based large-scale reading intervention in a multicultural urban school district. American Educational Research Journal, 43,131-154.
  • Sawkins, J. W. (2002). Examination performance in Scottish secondary schools: An ordered logic approach. Applied Economics, 34, 2031-2041.
  • Schreiber, J. B. (2002). Institutional and student factors and their influence on advanced mathematics achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 95, 274-286.
  • Silins, H., & Mulford, B. (2004). Schools as learning organizations–Effects on teacher leadership and student outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 15, 443-466.
  • Stiefel, L., Berne, R., Intarola, P., & Fruchter, N. (2000). High school size: Budgets and performance in New York City. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22, 27-39.
  • Sturman, L. (2003). Teaching to the test: Science or intuition? Educational Research, 45, 261-273.
  • Tornroos, J. (2005). Mathematics textbooks, opportunity to learn and student achieve- mentstudies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 31, 315-327.
  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202-248.
  • Walberg, H. J., & Walberg, H. J., III. (1994). Losing local control. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 19-26.
  • Willms, J. D., & Ma, X. (2004). School disciplinary climate: Characteristics and effects on eighth grade achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 169-188.
  • Witte, J. F., & Walsh, D. J. (1990). A systematic test of the effective schools model. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 12, 188-212.